Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Acta Cardiol ; 77(7): 567-572, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1377937

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still challenging health care systems worldwide. Over time, it has become clear that respiratory disease is not the only important entity as critically ill patients are also more prone to develop complications, such as acute cardiac injury. Despite extensive research, the mainstay of treatment still relies on supportive care and targeted therapy of these complications. The development of a prognostic model which helps clinicians to diverge patients to an appropriate level of care is thus crucial. As a result, several prognostic markers have been studied in the past few months. Among them are the cardiac biomarkers, especially cardiac troponins T/I and brain natriuretic peptide, which seem to have important prognostic values as several reports have confirmed their strong association with adverse clinical outcomes and death. The use of these biomarkers as part of a prognostic tool could potentially result in more precise risk stratification of COVID-19 patients and divergence to an adequate level of care. However, several caveats persist causing international guidelines to still recommend in favour of a more conservative approach to cardiac biomarker testing for prognostic purposes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain , Troponin I , Troponin T , Humans , Biomarkers , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/analysis , Prognosis , Troponin I/analysis , Troponin T/analysis
2.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0256035, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1359100

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chloroquine was promoted as a COVID-19 therapeutic early in the pandemic. Most countries have since discontinued the use of chloroquine due to lack of evidence of any benefit and the risk of severe adverse events. The primary aim of this study was to examine if administering chloroquine during COVID-19 imposed an increased risk of ischemic heart injury or heart failure. METHODS: Medical records, laboratory findings, and electrocardiograms of patients with COVID-19 who were treated with 500 mg chloroquine phosphate daily and controls not treated with chloroquine were reviewed retrospectively. Controls were matched in age and severity of disease. RESULTS: We included 20 patients receiving chloroquine (500 mg twice daily) for an average of five days, and 40 controls. The groups were comparable regarding demographics and biochemical analyses including C-reactive protein, thrombocytes, and creatinine. There were no statistically significant differences in cardiac biomarkers or in electrocardiograms. Median troponin T was 10,8 ng/L in the study group and 17.9 ng/L in the control group, whereas median NT-proBNP was 399 ng/L in patients receiving chloroquine and 349 ng/L in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: We found no increased risk of ischemic heart injury or heart failure as a result of administering chloroquine. However, the use of chloroquine to treat COVID-19 outside of clinical trials is not recommended, considering the lack of evidence of its effectiveness, as well as the elevated risk of fatal arrythmias.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Biomarkers/analysis , Chloroquine/analogs & derivatives , Heart Failure/etiology , Heart Injuries/etiology , Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19/virology , Case-Control Studies , Chloroquine/adverse effects , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Creatinine/analysis , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart Failure/metabolism , Heart Injuries/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/analysis , Peptide Fragments/analysis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Troponin T/analysis , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
3.
Curr Heart Fail Rep ; 18(3): 163-168, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1118277

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) resulted in the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. While primarily a respiratory virus, SARS-CoV-2 can cause myocardial injury. The pattern of injury, referred to as acute COVID-19 cardiovascular syndrome (ACovCS), is defined by cardiac troponin leak in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Although the etiology of the injury is unknown, many speculate that a cytokine release syndrome (CRS) may be an important factor. We aim to review recent data concerning markers of cardiac injury in ACovCS and its relation to the CRS. RECENT FINDINGS: Cardiac injury was common in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, with both cardiac troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) being elevated in this population. Biomarkers were correlated with illness severity and increased mortality. Cytokines such as IL-6 were more often elevated in patients with ACovCS. Myocarditis evident on cardiac MR following COVID-19 may be associated with cardiac troponin levels. The impact of dexamethasone and remdesivir, two therapies shown to have clinical benefit in COVID-19, on myocardial injury is unknown. Biomarkers of cardiac stress and injury in COVID-19 may be used to stratify risk in the future. Currently, there is no evidence that inhibition of cytokine release will reduce myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiomyopathies , Cytokine Release Syndrome/blood , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/analysis , Troponin/analysis , Biomarkers/analysis , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/immunology , Cardiomyopathies/blood , Cardiomyopathies/etiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 4930, 2021 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1114731

ABSTRACT

Multiple Biomarkers have recently been shown to be elevated in COVID-19, a respiratory infection with multi-organ dysfunction; however, information regarding the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers as it relates to disease severity and cardiac injury are inconsistent. The goal of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence regarding the prognostic relevance of cardiac biomarkers from data available in published reports. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched from inception through April 2020 for studies comparing median values of cardiac biomarkers in critically ill versus non-critically ill COVID-19 patients, or patients who died versus those who survived. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between the groups were calculated for each study and combined using a random effects meta-analysis model. The odds ratio (OR) for mortality based on cardiac injury was combined from studies reporting it. Troponin levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients who died or were critically ill versus those who were alive or not critically ill (WMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.70, p < 0.001). Additionally, BNP levels were also significantly higher in patients who died or were critically ill (WMD 0.45, 95% CI - 0.21-0.69, p < 0.001). Cardiac injury was independently associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (OR 6.641, 95% CI 1.26-35.1, p = 0.03). A significant difference in levels of D-dimer was seen in those who died or were critically ill. CK levels were only significantly higher in those who died versus those who were alive (WMD 0.79, 95% CI 0.25-1.33, p = 0.004). Cardiac biomarkers add prognostic value to the determination of the severity of COVID-19 and can predict mortality.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , Myocardium/metabolism , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Creatine Kinase/metabolism , Critical Illness , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/analysis , Peptide Fragments/analysis , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
5.
Intern Emerg Med ; 16(5): 1165-1172, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1074490

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has brought great challenges to the world. The objectives of this study were to describe the baseline characteristics and changes of biomarkers of these COVID-19 patients and identify predictive value of the above markers for patient death. Using patient death as the observational endpoints, clinical data of inpatients in a special ward for COVID-19 in Wuhan, China were retrospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate prognostic value of baseline characteristics and laboratory data changes. This study included clinical data of 75 patients. Age, c-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 levels were independent predictors of patient death. Survivors were characterized as having declining neutrophil counts, D-dimer, N-terminal pronatriuretic peptide, troponin I (TnI) and c-reactive protein levels, while counts of lymphocyte gradually came back. Non-survivors were characterized with increasing white blood cell counts (WBC) and neutrophil counts. Changes of WBC, TnI and interleukin-6 were also independently associated with patient death. Older age, baseline CRP and IL-6 levels may be used as meaningful predictors to identify patients with poor prognosis. Changes of biomarkers should be closely monitored in the management of patients with COVID-19, while constantly increasing levels of WBC, TnI and interleukin-6 in the disease course also predict patient death.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/mortality , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Cell Count/methods , Blood Cell Count/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Disease Progression , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , Lymphocytes/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/analysis , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Neutrophils/microbiology , Peptide Fragments/analysis , Peptide Fragments/blood , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Troponin I/analysis , Troponin I/blood
6.
Respir Res ; 21(1): 83, 2020 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-60448

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China has been declared a public health emergency of international concern. The cardiac injury is a common condition among the hospitalized patients with COVID-19. However, whether N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) predicted outcome of severe COVID-19 patients was unknown. METHODS: The study initially enrolled 102 patients with severe COVID-19 from a continuous sample. After screening out the ineligible cases, 54 patients were analyzed in this study. The primary outcome was in-hospital death defined as the case fatality rate. Research information and following-up data were obtained from their medical records. RESULTS: The best cut-off value of NT-proBNP for predicting in-hospital death was 88.64 pg/mL with the sensitivity for 100% and the specificity for 66.67%. Patients with high NT-proBNP values (> 88.64 pg/mL) had a significantly increased risk of death during the days of following-up compared with those with low values (≤88.64 pg/mL). After adjustment for potential risk factors, NT-proBNP was independently correlated with in-hospital death. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP might be an independent risk factor for in-hospital death in patients with severe COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials, NCT04292964. Registered 03 March 2020.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Hospital Mortality , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/analysis , Pandemics , Peptide Fragments/analysis , Pneumonia, Viral , Adult , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL